« Improvisational Theatre and training for micro-social advantage | Main | pop advisors/experts, j.d. roth, social scientists »

August 25, 2009

Comments

Hopefully Anonymous

One thing conspicuously absent from PUA discussion to me is macrosocial coordinations and sexual blockings, and detailed insight into gradient crossing.

For example, seducing a female from a highly endogamous trait community by a male who isn't part of that trait community.

Rather than going into the mechanics in detail the tendency seems to be to paper over differences in starting points between males, with the concept that women can overcome starting preferences by strength of pua skill.

That's good for marketing pua courses, but it's an unexplored area for social scientists, from what I can tell.

The comments to this entry are closed.